The Intel (INTC) Conundrum: When Will the Bleeding Stop?

Prominent chipmaker Intel Corporation’s (INTC) shares plunged more than 14% over the past five days. This downward trend follows the revelation that Intel incurred a significant operating loss of $7 billion last year for its chip-manufacturing unit, also called the foundry business, about 35% worse than in 2022. The unit reported revenue of $18.90 billion for 2023, down 31% year-over-year.

During an investor presentation, INTC’s CEO Patrick Gelsinger discussed the company's projections, stating that 2024 would likely mark the peak of operating losses for its chipmaking division. He mentioned that Intel anticipates reaching break-even on an operating basis by around 2027.

Pat Gelsinger further acknowledged challenges in the company’s foundry business, attributing to poor decisions, including one year ago against extreme ultraviolet (EUV) machines from the Dutch company ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Although these machines can cost more than $150 million, they are considered more cost-effective compared to earlier chip-making tools.

Partially due to these missteps, Intel has outsourced approximately 30% of its total wafer production to external contract manufacturers like TSMC, Gelsinger added. The company’s goal is to lower this number to around 20%.

Additionally, the semiconductor giant has now transitioned to using EUV tools, which are expected to handle an increasing portion of production requirements as older machinery is phased out.

“In the post EUV era, we see that we're very competitive now on price, performance (and) back to leadership,” Gelsinger stated. “And in the pre-EUV era we carried a lot of costs and (were) uncompetitive.”

However, on a negative note, investment bank Bernstein analysts recently remarked that there is no compelling reason to hold Intel stock until 2030.

Bernstein recognizes the potential for improvement in Intel’s foundry business, given the significant loss incurred last year and the optimistic projection for achieving a 25-30% operating margin by 2030.

However, analysts cautioned, suggesting that the road ahead for INTC might be challenging, even with the seemingly ambitious targets. They noted that reaching break-even may not happen until after 2027, and the ambitious goals set for 2030 are speculative and dependent on achieving optimal progress, which remains a topic of debate.

In the last reported earnings, INTC surpassed analysts’ estimates on revenue and EPS. However, the chipmaker announced a weak forecast for the current quarter. For the quarter that ended December 31, 2023, INTC’s net revenue increased 10% year-over-year to $15.40 billion. This surpassed the consensus revenue estimate of $15.17 billion.

Also, net income attributable to Intel was $2.70 billion, compared to a net loss of $700 million in the previous year’s period. The company reported an EPS of $0.63, compared to analysts’ estimate of $0.22, and a loss per share of $0.16 in the same quarter of 2022.

However, as of September 30, 2023, the company’s cash and cash equivalents stood at $7.07 billion versus $11.14 billion as of December 31, 2022.

Intel’s fourth-quarter 2023 report marked a return to growth after eight consecutive quarters of decreasing earnings and seven straight quarters of declining sales on a year-over-year basis. But for the first quarter, the chip company projected adjusted EPS of just $13 on sales of $12.70 billion. Analysts expect earnings of $0.14 per share on revenue of $12.78 billion.

During an earnings call, Intel CEO Patrick Gelsinger stated that the company’s first-quarter sales would be impacted by difficulties at Mobileye, where Intel holds a majority stake, and in its programmable chip unit.

Gelsinger also mentioned that Intel’s core businesses, particularly PC and server chips, were performing strongly, with sales expected to fall within the lower end of the seasonal range.

On March 21, INTC announced plans to invest $100 billion in constructing and expanding chip factories across four states in the U.S., following securing $19.50 billion in federal grants and loans and wishes to secure another $25 billion in tax breaks.

Intel’s primary focus in its five-year spending plan is to convert undeveloped land near Columbus, Ohio, into what CEO Pat Gelsinger described as “the largest AI chip manufacturing site in the world,” with potential commencement in 2027.

In addition, the chip giant intends to revamp sites in New Mexico and Oregon while expanding its presence in Arizona. This initiative aligns with rival Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. (TSM) construction of a massive factory in Arizona, leveraging President Joe Biden's efforts to bolster advanced semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S.

Intel was at the forefront of the semiconductor industry for decades and was known for producing the fastest and smallest chips. The company commanded premium prices for its products and reinvested its profits into continuous research and development (R&D), aiming to stay ahead of its competitors.

However, in the 2010s, INTC’s manufacturing superiority waned, particularly in comparison to TSM. This shift resulted in a significant drop in profit margins as Intel had to lower prices to maintain its market share, even though its products were perceived as less competitive than its rivals.

In 2021, Gelsinger unveiled a strategy to restore Intel to its former top position in the semiconductor market, acknowledging the necessity of government support to ensure the plan’s profitability. With the federal support secured, the chipmaker is now gearing up for substantial investments.

Gelsinger mentioned that approximately 30% of the $100 billion budget will be earmarked for construction expenses, covering labor, piping, and concrete. The remaining funds will be utilized to acquire chipmaking tools from firms like ASML, Tokyo Electron, Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT), and KLA Corporation (KLAC), among others.

Moreover, Intel's strategy for business turnaround hinges on persuading external companies to use its manufacturing services. In February, INTC announced that Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) plans to use its services to manufacture a tailored computing chip. Moreover, the company expressed optimism about exceeding its internal target of surpassing TSM in advanced chip manufacturing before 2025.

As a part of this plan, INTC recently told investors it would start reporting the results of its manufacturing operations as a separate unit.

Intel’s new reporting structure, effective from the first quarter of 2024, includes operating segments such as Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), Network and Edge (NEX), Intel Foundry, Altera (now Intel’s Programmable Solutions Group), Mobileye, and Other. CCG, DCAI, and NEX will be collectively known as Intel Products, while Altera, Mobileye, and Other will be referred to as All Other.

The newly established Intel Foundry segment, including foundry technology development, foundry manufacturing and supply chain, and foundry services, will recognize revenues generated from external foundry customers and Intel Products, along with technology development and product manufacturing costs historically allocated to Intel Products.

Intel’s CFO, Dave Zinsner stated, “This model is designed to unlock significant cost savings, operational efficiencies and asset value. As it begins to take hold, we expect to accelerate on our path toward achieving our ambition of 60% non-GAAP gross margins and 40% non-GAAP operating margins in 2030. Ultimately, improved cost competitiveness will help us deliver process technology, product, and foundry leadership while driving significant financial upside for Intel and our owners.”

Bottom Line

Last week, INTC confirmed its intention to separate the financial results of its foundry business, providing investors with a closer look at its historical performance. However, the revealed figures were disappointing: the foundry business suffered losses of nearly $7 billion in 2023, a 35% increase in losses compared to 2022, alongside a 31% decrease in sales.

Along with these figures, the company stressed that the new financial reporting structure is designed to boost cost discipline and higher returns by offering enhanced transparency, accountability, and incentives across the business. Moreover, this transition is expected to unlock unrealized value across Intel’s about $100 billion in capital assets.

Last month, Intel unveiled plans to spend those $100 billion on building or expanding chip factories in four U.S. states. As part of its turnaround strategy, the chipmaker aims to convince external companies to utilize its manufacturing services. The company has been heavily investing to compete with its main chipmaking rivals, including TSM and Samsung Electronics Co Ltd.

Despite Intel’s optimism about turning the business around and achieving break-even by 2027, with a projected adjusted operating profit margin of 30% by 2030, analysts, including those at Bernstein, are cautious. They view Intel’s forecast as overly ambitious, suggesting that actual margins might only reach 25% by 2030.

Further, CNBC’s Jim Cramer advises investors to avoid investing in Intel despite the company’s turnaround plans.

While INTC is actively pursuing its turnaround initiatives, it currently encounters significant challenges, including underperformance within its foundry business, fierce competition, and cash burn. So, it could be wise to steer clear of this stock now.

Buying the Dip or Selling the Rally: Timing Your Moves in Boeing’s Stock

The Boeing Company (BA), renowned for its innovation and dominance in the aerospace sector, has recently found itself in turbulent skies. In January 2024, the company faced severe criticism following an unfortunate incident involving a commercial Boeing 737 Max 9. During ascent, the door panel dislodged, resulting in a substantial opening on the side of the aircraft.

This unsettling event marked the start of a challenging year for BA in 2024 and brought renewed attention to the Boeing 737 Max planes, which have already been involved in two past crashes in 2018 and 2019, killing almost 346 people.

In addition, it also highlighted broader concerns about the quality control of BA’s planes, including how they are made, parts storage, and the rush to meet production deadlines.

According to an investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), BA failed 33 out of 89 product audits related to its plane manufacturing, which is highly concerning. As a prominent commercial aircraft manufacturer, Boeing plays a crucial role in the aviation industry; however, its recent errors have raised significant concerns about the overall integrity of the industry.

As a result of this January mishap, which was followed by heightened scrutiny from the FAA, BA is experiencing a major production slowdown. The FAA has set a production limit of 38 jets per month for BA, but the actual output has often fallen well below this threshold, dipping to single digits by late March.

Conversely, Airbus SE (EADSF), BA’s major industry rival, maintains a comparably strong production pace for its A320neo-family jets, with an average of 46 flights per month in the first quarter of 2024. According to BA’s Chief Financial Officer, Brian West, the company is implementing various measures to tackle quality issues and boost confidence among stakeholders.

Despite BA's attempts to restore confidence in the company's prospects among its stakeholders, the recent news of BA’s CEO David Calhoun stepping down underscores the immense pressure BA is currently facing.

Furthermore, BA’s chairman, Larry Kellner, has opted not to stand for re-election as a board director. Instead, the board has chosen former Qualcomm CEO Steve Mollenkopf to take his place.

Meanwhile, Stan Deal, the CEO of BA Commercial Airplanes, is retiring, and Stephanie Pope, who has been serving as BA’s chief operating officer since January, will step into his role.

In a letter addressed to BA employees, Calhoun characterized the January Alaska Airlines incident as a critical juncture for BA. Highlighting his intentions to step down, Calhoun emphasized the global scrutiny the company is facing. The letter further assured stakeholders of the company's commitment to resolving the issues and guiding it toward recovery and stability.

Calhoun’s departure amid intense criticism from major airline CEOs further highlights the company's difficulties. For instance, some of BA’s key customers, including Michael O’Leary, the CEO of Ryanair, Europe's biggest airline, and Scott Kirby, the CEO of United Airlines, have expressed disappointment with BA’s quality issues and delivery delays.

CEO Scott Kirby of United Airlines referred to the Alaska Airlines incident as a tipping point in their plans to acquire the BA’s Max 10 this year as originally intended. Consequently, they are now exploring the option of purchasing aircraft from BA’s competitor, Airbus, to replace the Max 10s they had ordered.

Bottom Line

With its shares down roughly 23% over the past three months, there is no denying that BA is currently going through its worst-ever crisis. The company's future is uncertain as the company’s CEO steps down, and the successor remains undecided.

Meanwhile, BA's recent quarterly results exceeded analyst expectations. The airline company reported fourth-quarter revenue of $22.02 billion, surpassing the $19.98 billion revenue in the prior year quarter and the consensus estimate of $21.08 billion.

During the same quarter, the company reported a non-GAAP core loss per share of $0.47, an improvement from the loss per share of $1.75 in the prior-year quarter and lower than analysts' estimate of $0.79. However, its free cash flow dropped 5.8% from the year-ago value, reaching $2.95 billion.

The company has reaffirmed its financial targets for 2025 and 2026, which include reaching approximately $10 billion in free cash flow and achieving $100 billion in revenue by as early as next year.

Despite exceeding analyst expectations for the fourth quarter, BA’s forthcoming quarterly results could hinder the company’s financial goals due to production delays and major airline customers choosing to procure aircraft from Airbus.

Furthermore, the company’s decision to withhold 2024 guidance during the recent earnings highlights the uncertainty surrounding its commercial airplane deliveries for this year. This uncertainty, ongoing production challenges, leadership shakeup, and customer preference shifts cast a shadow over BA’s prospects.

To that end, investing in BA’s shares might not be wise now. Investors could monitor the company for further developments and wait for clarity on its future direction.

Anticipating Bitcoin's Halving Event and Investment Implications

The cryptocurrency market remains highly active lately as investors are increasingly interested in new spot bitcoin (BTC) exchange-traded funds ahead of the upcoming bitcoin halving event in April. This event typically generates significant attention and anticipation in the crypto market.

Simultaneously, there’s a growing focus on the global digital asset regulatory environment. Last month, European regulators passed new anti-money laundering legislation, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated actions that could lead to Ethereum (ETH) being classified as a security ahead of a critical May deadline on various spot Ethereum ETF applications.

Historically, the period from February through April has shown strength in bitcoin prices, and investors are optimistic that the crypto rally observed in early 2024 will extend into the second quarter.

The cryptocurrency market has continued its strong upward trend this year, building on the significant gains seen in 2023, when Ethereum surged by 85% and bitcoin by more than 150% in 2023. Heading into April, bitcoin prices are up about 64% year-to-date, and Ethereum prices have rallied more than 51%.

During the first half of March, bitcoin prices surged to reach a new intraday all-time high of $73,750.16. However, the latter part of the month saw bitcoin trading within a broad range of approximately $60,000 to $72,000. By the end of March, bitcoin prices closed at $70,849, marking a monthly gain of 14%.

In contrast, Ethereum prices experienced a more modest increase of 5.8% for the month, ending at $3,611.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs in the Spotlight

Bitcoin’s price surged above $71,000 multiple times last week, and this increase was supported by significant net inflows exceeding $243.4 million into bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) on Thursday.

Notably, the Ark 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB) recorded net inflows of $200.7 million last Wednesday alone, making it the third bitcoin ETF to surpass the $200 million mark since the SEC approved the listing and trading of 11 spot bitcoin exchange-traded product (ETP) shares after years of repeated rejections in January.

Before ARKB, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity Advantage Bitcoin ETF (FBTC) crossed this $200 million mark in a single day.

According to James Wo, founder and CEO of Digital Finance Group, the spot bitcoin ETFs continue to play a central role in the 2024 crypto rally.

“Bitcoin broke past its all-time high in March as the bitcoin ETFs saw a daily net inflow of over $1 billion, an amount higher than the inflow experienced from the launch date. As more participants seek to gain exposure to cryptocurrencies, the bitcoin ETFs provided easier access to this asset class, which fueled the strong demand in March, pulling up the rest of the crypto market with it,” Wo stated.

Bitcoin Halving Event: The Primary Catalyst for a Prolonged Climb in Cryptocurrency’s Value

Bitcoin’s recent surge and its overall value proposition are primarily driven by increasing anticipation surrounding the upcoming “Bitcoin halving” event, scheduled to occur on April 19, 2024. This event is a built-in feature of Bitcoin’s protocol that reduces the rate of bitcoin production, with the block reward expected to decline from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC.

The halving event holds significance on multiple fronts. Firstly, it directly impacts the economics of Bitcoin mining. As the block reward decreases, miners earn fewer Bitcoins, potentially affecting the profitability of mining operations. This could lead some miners to cease operations if mining costs outweigh the rewards, resulting in adjustments to the network’s hash rate and mining difficulty.

Additionally, the halving sparks heightened speculation and interest from investors and traders. Historically, Bitcoin halving events have been linked to bull markets and price surges due to reduced supply and sustained or increased demand. The halving underscores Bitcoin’s deflationary nature and scarcity. With the issuance rate halved, Bitcoin becomes scarcer over time, potentially driving up demand and long-term price appreciation.

Historically, halving events have led to substantial price increases for Bitcoin. For instance, after the 2012 halving, Bitcoin’s price surged from $12 to over $900 within a year. Likewise, following the second halving in 2026, the price climbed from about $600 to $2,500.

Further, the third halving event held in May 2020 saw the price jump from around $8,000 to over $40,000 within a year.

In the past, bitcoin’s price typically showed stability before its halving events, often due to an uptick in supply available on exchanges. However, this time, there’s a notable difference, as pointed out by Austin Arnold, a crypto market analyst and the founder of “Altcoin Daily.”

He added that an unprecedented level of excitement and institutional fear of missing out (FOMO) surrounding Bitcoin, fueled by a quest for inflation-resistant assets, contributes to a potential supply-and-demand shock even before the actual halving occurs.

Arnold further projected a doubling of Bitcoin’s price within a year post-halving, potentially reaching between $100,000 and $150,000, guided by the fundamental principle of supply and demand dynamics.

Bottom Line

Several major cryptocurrencies experienced a rally lately, fueled by various potential catalysts such as significant net inflows into bitcoin ETFs, notable filings for spot Ether ETFs, and anticipation surrounding the upcoming “bitcoin halving” event scheduled on April 19.

The bitcoin halving event, which is the fourth in bitcoin’s history, with prior halvings in 2012, 2016, and 2020, involves cutting miners’ rewards in half to control the introduction of new bitcoins until the maximum limit of 21 million bitcoins is reached. Historically, bitcoin’s price has surged after each halving event, leading investors to speculate on a potential rally next month.

Analysts speculate that the current Bitcoin price of around $66,000 could potentially reach approximately $150,000 post-halving, highlighting the anticipation and impact of this event on Bitcoin’s market dynamics. The halving event brings significant attention to the crypto space, attracting new investors and contributing to increased trading activity.

While Bitcoin halving events have been associated with bull markets and substantial price rallies, past performance does not indicate future results. So, investors should exercise caution and conduct thorough analysis before making investment decisions, as the crypto market is known for its volatility and unpredictability.

Microsoft (MSFT): Analyzing Investor Opportunities Amidst New Generative AI Tools

The enthusiasm for the transformative potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is mounting. Companies from various sectors are actively exploring its applications, be it enhancing worker productivity, facilitating communication with stakeholders, or streamlining operational processes to foster efficiency and growth.

Despite widespread adoption among other C-suite executives, many traditionally cautious CFOs hesitate to embrace generative AI. Concerns over return on investment (ROI) and cost containment persist, hindering their full engagement in leveraging this technology's potential benefits.

According to the CNBC CFO Council survey for the first quarter of 2024, only a third of respondents anticipate increased capital expenditures over the next year. Of this group, merely 7% intend to allocate funds toward new AI capabilities, ranking lower than other investment priorities like market expansion or facility development.

Yet, a suite of specialized tools tailored for CFOs and finance teams is emerging from various business software providers. Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is at the forefront, launching Microsoft Copilot for Finance. The tool empowers financial professionals within Microsoft 365, offering AI-driven support for critical decision-making processes.

Cory Hrncirik, modern finance lead at MSFT, has emphasized the significance of leveraging generative AI to blend structured and unstructured data sets. He asserts that comparing data from different systems is “something every finance team on the planet does a lot of.”

Furthermore, MSFT’s Copilot drastically reduces the time spent on reconciliation tasks for thousands of financial planning and analysis professionals. Previously, individuals would allocate one or two hours weekly to this process, whereas with Copilot, the task now only demands 10 to 20 minutes.

MSFT’s commitment to advancing business applications through AI-driven solutions underscores its dedication to addressing challenges organizations face. Copilot for Finance represents a significant step forward in empowering finance professionals to navigate complexities and drive success in today’s dynamic business landscape.

Strategic Collaborations and Expansion Avenues

MSFT’s commitment to AI extends beyond individual projects, encompassing strategic collaborations to bolster its AI capabilities. One such venture is the proposed “Stargate” project with OpenAI, involving a $100 billion investment to construct a massive supercomputing cluster supporting advanced AI models.

For perspective, MSFT’s expenditure on building clusters for training OpenAI’s GPT-4 model exceeded several hundred million dollars. OpenAI, in turn, is currently developing a successor to GPT-4, likely named GPT-5, utilizing MSFT’s existing data centers.

In parallel, data security firm Rubrik is eyeing a New York Stock Exchange listing, aiming to raise $500 million to $700 million. Backed by MSFT, which has held a stake in Rubrik since 2021, the IPO underscores the company's interest in expanding its presence in data security.

Moreover, MSFT and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have deepened their collaboration, integrating NVIDIA’s generative AI and Omniverse™ technologies into Microsoft Azure, Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Microsoft 365. The partnership aims to provide customers with comprehensive platforms and tools across the Copilot stack, facilitating breakthroughs in AI capabilities.

From introducing the GB200 Grace Blackwell processor to Azure to enhancing integrations between DGX Cloud and Microsoft Fabric, these initiatives underscore MSFT's commitment to empowering customers with radical AI solutions spanning hardware and software domains.

Upbeat Financial Results Serve as Evidence

In the fiscal 2024 second-quarter earnings release, MSFT reported a remarkable 33% surge in profit for the October-December quarter, propelled by substantial investments in artificial intelligence. The company's focus on AI within its cloud-computing unit drove significant growth, surpassing Wall Street expectations.

MSFT’s earnings per share for the quarter came in at $2.93, beating the consensus estimate of $2.77. Its revenue stood at $62.02 billion, surpassing analyst expectations of $61.13 billion and up 17.6% year-over-year.

In addition, the company's cloud-centric segment witnessed robust growth, with revenue climbing 20% year-over-year to $25.88 billion. Office Suite and LinkedIn revenue grew by 13% year-over-year to $19.25 billion, and the personal computing business, including Xbox, surged by 19% to $16.89 billion, notably bolstered by the addition of Activision Blizzard.

Jeremy Goldman, director of briefings at Insider Intelligence, has hailed MSFT as a frontrunner in the AI realm, predicting its potential to expand into digital advertising. His firm anticipates the company's worldwide ad revenues to reach $14.93 billion, reflecting a 12% increase this year.

Looking ahead, Wall Street expects MSFT's revenue to increase 15.3% year-over-year to $244.34 billion for the fiscal year ending June 2024. Moreover, the company's EPS is estimated to rise 19.2% from the previous year to $11.69. Furthermore, MSFT has topped the consensus revenue and EPS estimates in all four trailing quarters, which is impressive.

Bottom Line

With staggering market projections, artificial intelligence is poised to become the paramount Next Big Thing. Statista forecasts the AI market to hit approximately $305 billion this year and nearly $740 billion by 2030, although some skeptics argue it’s mere hype.

Notably, Wall Street analysts pinpoint MSFT as a major beneficiary of the AI surge. CEO Satya Nadella emphasized the company’s wholehearted embrace of AI, citing its integration across the entire data stack and its substantial productivity enhancements.

Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives has raised MSFT’s price target to $500 from $475, citing the transformative potential of Copilot and the accelerating adoption of AI technology. He anticipates a significant increase in Azure cloud deal flow as AI applications proliferate throughout the enterprise landscape.

Ives predicts that 70% of MSFT's enterprise base will utilize AI-driven functionality within three years, fundamentally altering the company's trajectory. He estimates Copilot alone could contribute $25-30 billion to the company’s revenue by 2025, underscoring its pivotal role in its growth.

Concurrently, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) maintains a bullish outlook on MSFT, labeling it a “top pick” with a buy rating and a $480 stock price target. Also, Jefferies Financial Group Inc. (JEF) analyst Brent Thill echoes this sentiment, raising the price target to $550 and affirming MSFT as the leading AI player, poised to capitalize on transformative opportunities in infrastructure and applications.

Given these factors, MSFT emerges as a compelling investment choice with the potential for substantial returns amid the burgeoning AI landscape.

Evaluating Buy and Sell Opportunities Post Visa-Mastercard's $30B Deal

Visa Inc. (V) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA) recently made headlines with a settlement estimated at $30 billion, marking a significant development in the U.S. retail and banking sectors. This antitrust settlement, one of the most significant in U.S. history, addresses long-standing disputes over credit and debit card fees stemming from a nationwide litigation that started in 2005.

V and MA have consented to various alterations in the short run as a component of the resolution. They agree that companies could decrease interchange rates - the charge merchants must pay for managing a credit card payment, also called “swipe rates” - by a minimum of 4 basis points (0.04 percent units) for three years. Swipe rates need to be seven basis points less than the average during the next five years.

In addition, it will become easier for merchants to guide customers toward other payment methods, and they can apply extra costs to premium credit cards with higher swipe fees. The settlement is still under the court’s endorsement and won't take effect until late 2024 or 2025.

Anticipated Impact on Merchants and Consumers

Patrick Payne, an assistant professor in personal and family financial planning at the University of Arizona in Tucson, does not expect “dramatic changes” from this agreement but thinks it might make premium cards more costly.

The cards are already costly. For example, the Chase Sapphire Reserve requires an annual fee of $550, but it offers benefits such as access to airport lounge membership and a $300 yearly travel credit. The annual fee for the American Express Platinum Card is almost $700.

Premium cards are more expensive for merchants, too. According to the National Retail Federation, swipe fees typically range around 2% per transaction but can go up as high as 4% for premium rewards cards. If the settlement gets approved, merchants will have the right to charge their customers extra when using premium Visa and Mastercard credit cards.

However, it's not certain whether stores will agree to increase the costs for these customers. Demanding an additional surcharge from specific customers, especially those who pay a lot, might harm relationships and business.

Now, what does it imply for the consumers, the ones who are actually swiping their cards? Probably not a lot, according to experts. “We’ll need to wait and see,” stated Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at Bankrate. “My honest assessment is that I don’t think this is a big deal for any party involved,” he said.

Rossman said the settlement’s impact is not much because it lowers swipe fees by less than 1% for a few years and caps the rates for five years. “That’s such a minimal change that I don’t think it’s going to make a big impact,” he remarked.

That said, critics argue that even though this new rule might control market powers, it does not necessarily solve issues related to dominance and setting fees.

Beverly Harzog, the writer of “The Debt Escape Plan: How to Free Yourself from Credit Card Balances, Boost Your Credit Score, and Live Debt-Free,” shared that she doesn't think there will be much alteration among credit card issuers following the agreement. This is partly due to alterations not being a “permanent fix.”

She mentioned how three- and five-year spans allow very little time for these firms to implement substantial changes.

Additionally, Rossman adds that the settlement is “a flash point in a larger war,” maybe the most crucial fight yet is about the Credit Card Competition Act. Democratic Senator Dick Durbin from Illinois suggested this law, and it might bring in more competition to this area.

Rossman believes that if Durbin’s bill becomes law, it would significantly affect the financial sector more than the recent settlement. He also mentions how improbable it is for this bill to be approved at the present time. “That's the type of thing that could really change credit cards,” he added.

Bottom Line

Visa and Mastercard are notable players in the consumer financial industry. They are primarily known for their dominance in high-margin businesses, characterized by a consistent increase in revenue and profit fueled by consumer spending. This aspect has garnered significant popularity among investors, as both V and MA stocks have delivered impressive returns over the years.

V and MA have not provided specific details on how the recent settlement could impact their performance in the coming years. Investors may have to wait for their next quarterly reports to gain more insight.

While both companies are financially strong enough to handle the effects of the settlement, the potential savings of $30 billion for merchants over five years translate to a significant annual impact of $3 billion for each firm. This could have substantial implications, potentially resetting revenue levels lower than their current status and leading to slower growth rates.

Besides interchange fees as the primary income source, V and MA earn money from other places, such as small-business solutions. However, most of their revenue still comes from interchange fees.

Despite these potential challenges, the fundamental business model of Visa and Mastercard remains unchanged. However, the settlement’s financial impact underscores the need for investors to closely monitor developments and assess how they could influence the companies’ financial performance and growth trajectory moving forward.

Additionally, regardless of the settlement’s unknowns, V and MA shares still trade at premiums over their peers. For instance, V’s forward non-GAAP P/E of 28.08x is 162% higher than the industry average of 10.54x. Also, its forward EV/Sales and EV/EBITDA multiples of 15.70 and 22.23 compared to respective industry averages of 3.02 and 10.52.

Likewise, MA’s forward non-GAAP P/E of 33.24x is 215.4% higher than the industry average by 10.54x. Additionally, the stock’s forward EV/sales and EV/EBITDA multiples of 16.12 and 26.24 unfavorably compared to the industry averages of 3.02 and 10.52, respectively.

Moreover, both V and MA exhibit notable volatility, with V boasting a 60-month beta of 0.96 and MA standing at 1.08. Considering these factors, investors may benefit from waiting for further clarity on the settlement's repercussions before scooping up shares of V and MA.