5 ETFs That You Need to Look at Right Now

5 ETFs That You Need to Look at Right Now

The five ETFs that we are referring to are going to play a major role in the future and you need to know about them today.

In this short video I show you the overriding trend and potential for each of these markets in the future.

As always our videos are free to watch and there is no need for registration. We would appreciate your valuable feedback on this posting and let us know whether you found it helpful or not.

All the best,

Adam Hewison
President, INO.com
Co-creator, MarketClub

19 thoughts on “5 ETFs That You Need to Look at Right Now

  1. The Perfect Portfolio looks very interesting. The inverses you could use in an IRA or if you do not like shorting EUO,DDG,DGZ,SH & CMD.

    Good Trades,

    Perry

  2. Rao,

    Thanks for your feedback.

    With the Perfect Portfolio you are in the market all the time both on the long side and short side. You simply reverse your position from long to short. That's it.

    When you are in these 4 markets you are diversified which reduces your risk. It looks like gold is now decoupling from the equity markets. Return last month for the Perfect Portfolio was 2.8%.

    All the best,
    Adam

  3. Hi Adam

    How do you assign stops in the strategy of the perfect portfolio. The approach is that we are looking at longer term trends based on the monthly triangles so there will be some level of swings till a monthly triangle is triggered. Do you recommend any guidelines for stops? 10 % down trailing ??

    Any feedback will be much appreciated.

    Rao

  4. adam:

    I am getting more comfortable with your system as I am still a relatively new subscriber. And I am following the ETFs. The question is what are the symbols for the Conra ETFs that mirrow the 5 you mentioned. As I read the trade trianges and do some other analysis I would either play long on the regular ETFs but would rather go long on the Contras than short on th ETFs. (Or I could do puts on the ETFs if we get a major market down. BTW, I trade on intermediate term, not day trade.

    Thanks and keep up the good work.

    David

  5. Just how long does it take for a post to actually post? i put out a question a while back and no answer so far.

  6. Adam, this is the type of information which I have been waiting for;i.e, it is short, sweet and to-the-point with only five ETFs which are recommended.

  7. Hi Adam,

    Any ideas when gold will continue with its uptrend and get beyond the $1060 mark again? We gained big yesterday but have already given back 3/4 of those gains today.

    Any ideas when the markets are going to stop their declines? Were the S & P's gains yesterday (Thursday) just a fake out before it headed lower again today - and perhaps for next week too?

    Any advice / info you could give Adam would be appreciated!

    Thank you!

    Eve

    1. Eve,

      Thanks for your feedback.

      I think gold decoupled on Friday. Not sure if you watched the trading action on the last day of the month, but gold was rallying while the equity markets were tanking.

      I remain longer term bullish on gold and have a $1,250 target zone.

      All the best,
      Adam

    1. Earl,

      DMA stands for Daily Moving Average. A strong DMA means a rising moving average meaning prices a trending higher. The opposite is true with a weak DMA.

      All the best,
      Adam

  8. Adam, if we are looking at higher interest rates down the road, and an strenghting in the dollar why are we looking at those etf's? when the dollar rises aside from maybe the SPY, and maybe the USO, the others are dead in the water? please explain the reasoning behind your picks? thank you

    1. Debbie,

      The key to these markets is that they are big-global and volatile. What that tells me is that these markets are going to see some significant moves in the future.

      That is all we need.

      When markets do not move you cannot make money. ETFs can be traded both from the long and short side which gives you equal trading opportunities on both sides.

      All the best,
      Adam

  9. Tim,

    Thanks for your feedback.

    That is great info for our readers. I think we are both right in that the ETF is one that is designed to track commodity prices. I agree with you in that perhaps the name is a little misleading. I am guessing they picked it for marketing purposes.

    Great post.

    Adam

  10. The CRBQ ETF name is misleading if one assumes it tracks the infamous CRB Index (see below for its actual makeup).

    The equity index that CRBQ will track is a modified capitalization-weighted, float-adjusted, rules-based index that currently consists of 142 companies engaged in the production and distribution of commodities and commodity-related products and services in the following four sectors: agriculture, base/industrial metals, energy, and precious metals. Each component must derive more than 50% of its annual revenues from the production and distribution of commodities and commodity-related products and services. Hence the “In-The-Ground” designation.

    The CRBQ fact sheet from ALPS lists all 142 stocks and their weightings with Monsanto (MON) at 7.3%, Exxon Mobil (XOM) at 5.9%, and Potash (POT) at 4.6%. The top ten holdings represent 37.9% of the fund and 13 receive less than 0.1% weighting. Total fund operating expenses are 0.65%.

    The CRBQ fund overview provides good background on the fund and indicates that current sector weightings are energy 39%, agriculture 38%, base/industrial metals 14%, and precious metals (9%). The top country weightings include USA 37.0%, Canada 13.9%, UK 8.5%, Russia 6.8%, Switzerland 5.3%, and Brazil 3.5%. The four sector weightings will be revised annually in June and the index is rebalanced quarterly,

  11. GREAT VIDEO'S. VERY IMPRESSIVE.

    ONE SUGGESTION, THIS REFERS TO THE LAST VIDEO ON THE 5 ETF'S. WHEN YOU DISCUSS A PARTICULAR ETF A LARGE CAPTION APPEARS ON THE SCREEN, WHILE YOU ARE TALKING AND MARKING ASPECTS OF THE POINTS YOU ARE MAKING. AS A RESULT, WHAT YOU ARE DOING IS BLOCKED AND YOUR DISCUSSION CAN'T BE FOLLOWED AS YOU DO IT.

    THUS, I AM TRYING TO SEE WHAT YOU UNDERLINED AND ABSORB IT, EVEN AS ANOTHER CAPTION IS BLOCKING IT OR, YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT A DIFFERENT LINE ON THE SCREEN. AS A RESULT I AM ALWAYS PLAYING CATCHUP.

    YOUR COMMENTS ARE VERY SOLID AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE. I LOSE A LOT OF WHAT YOU ARE SAYING THIS WAY.

Comments are closed.