Commodities go ka-ching; buyers go, 'Ouch'

WASHINGTON — Cold steel is red-hot. So is lead. And wheat. Commodities are the hottest investment on the planet today.

Investment banks are scrambling to hire commodity traders and analysts, even as they lay off thousands of existing employees. Oil prices approached the once-unthinkable level of $100 a barrel last month before falling back Friday to $88.71. Grain and oilseeds trading on Chicago futures exchanges are up more than 25% from 2006. Copper prices soared so high that the U.S. Mint had to ban people from melting pennies and nickels to resell the metal.

For farmers, mining companies and commodities brokers, the boom in oil, metals and agricultural products is a boon. But for consumers, who are paying sharply higher prices for food and energy, the bull market in commodities means spending less on other things, from vacations to restaurants and entertainment.

And for the Federal Reserve, soaring commodity prices mean struggling to meet two conflicting goals: fighting inflation even while pumping money into the nation's banking system to prevent a broad economic slowdown as housing and credit markets teeter.

Overall, commodity prices are showing the largest sustained gains since the late 1970s and early 1980s. The Reuters (RTRSY) CRB index, which measures the price of a basket of basic foodstuffs, metals and fuels, has soared 18% in the past 12 months, and 121% since Dec. 31, 1999.

Oil prices are the most important and visible sign of the trend: The price of a barrel of West Texas light, sweet crude is now $88.71, vs. $61 at the start of this year and $11.37 in February 1999. But the International Monetary Fund (IMF) notes precious metals such as gold, industrial metals such as lead and nickel, and foodstuffs, including wheat and edible oils, all hit record highs in 2007.

Even lesser-known commodities such as potash, a potassium-rich material used to promote root development in plants, are skyrocketing. As global food and biofuel needs accelerate, demand is outstripping supply. The Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan has gradually raised prices by 60% from last January.

"We've had most of our customers on an allocation basis for the better part of the year. We can't fulfill their orders. We're getting them what we can get them right now," says Rhonda Speiss of Potash.

Commodity prices are jumping for a host of reasons. Two in particular: India and China, whose economies are racing. China's output gained at an 11.5% annual pace in the third quarter, vs. 4.9% for the USA. India's GDP soared 9.3%.

Such enormous growth requires raw materials, and lots of them. China, for example, produced 3.6 million barrels of oil a day in 2005 but consumed 6.5 million.

And it's not just China and India, says author and hedge fund manager Jim Rogers. When commodities boomed in the 1970s, China, India and much of Asia were subsistence economies. No longer: Much of Asia and the Third World in general are seeing dramatically higher standards of living. "They're all in the game now," Rogers says.

Growing incomes in those nations also mean a growing appetite for grains and livestock. At the same time, poor weather hurt this year's world wheat crop, cutting the supply to a 30-year low. Rising demand for corn-based ethanol means not only that agriculture prices are more closely tied to oil prices, but that farmers are devoting more acreage to corn and less to other crops — a big reason soybean prices jumped from about $6.25 a bushel on futures markets last year to nearly $11 this year.

"High demand, low supply — the market is completely changed," says David Doeringsfeld, general manager of the Port of Lewiston, Idaho, which has seen a surge in barge shipments of grain this year. Doeringsfeld's facility ships to the Port of Portland, which set a port record in September for the most tonnage in a single month. The vast majority of it was dry bulk cargo, including grain, potash and soda ash.

The greater interest by big hedge funds and other investors in commodity markets is also a factor in price volatility, though it's not clear how much. But there's no question that commodity investment has gone mainstream.

The Options Group, an executive search and strategic consulting firm, in a recent study found commodity hiring rates on pace to jump 33% from 2006, while top pay packages are five times bigger than in 2002. Investment banks are hiring commodity traders, given the rapid rise in raw materials.

Of course, price pressures have moderated for some commodities. Lumber prices are down sharply since 2005, with a number of lumber mills closing — some permanently — as housing tumbles.

But Ken Simonson, chief economist of the Associated General Contractors of America, predicts another upswing in materials prices. Construction prices have been rising at a 2% to 3% annual rate in the past few months, which Simonson predicts will soon rise to a 4% to 6% pace and a 6% to 8% rate a year from now.

"So much of what construction uses requires a lot of energy to mine or mill or manufacture or deliver," Simonson says.

Economic threat

The surge in commodity prices hurts profits for many firms, depresses consumer spending, and pumps up the odds of increased inflation.

FedEx (FDX), for example, announced lower earnings due to high fuel prices. Campbell Soup (CPB) said high food and promotional costs crimped its bottom line.

Ken Goldstein, economist for the Conference Board, a private financial-analysis firm, notes that with profits down from recent lofty levels, companies may no longer be able to cover the higher cost of materials by reducing earnings.

"Despite all this talk about profit growth, earnings growth peaked a year ago," Goldstein says. "Businesses are going to have to force through some earnings power."

Some firms are.

Domino's and most pizza-delivery companies now levy a delivery charge, in part to compensate drivers for rising gasoline prices. Pepsi (PEP) raised Gatorade prices in the spring, citing delivery costs, and Starbucks bumped prices, too, blaming soaring dairy costs.

Economists, including the Fed, often prefer to use the core rate of inflation, which excludes the volatile food and energy components, when assessing short-term inflation trends. Consumers can't do that. Retail food inflation is running at a 5.5% rate this year, more than double the average pace. The energy component of the consumer price index has gained 14.5% since last October.

"The average wage earner buys gas at the gas station and food at the supermarket; no one gives them a discount to get their inflation rate down to core," says G. Kenneth Heebner, manager of CGM Capital Development (LOMCX) fund.

When consumers have to spend more on necessities, they have less available for niceties — such as new clothes, appliances or cars.

David Walker of Olathe, Kan., says higher oil prices have forced him to make big changes in his spending habits. Dining out is rare; so is casual shopping and going to see his beloved Kansas City Chiefs. "I got offered free tickets to the K.C./Green Bay game, and I had to decline," Walker says. "Tailgating costs alone precluded me from going."

The Fed in a bind

High commodity prices are one big reason for a seeming disconnect between financial markets, which expect additional Fed rate cuts to bolster the economy, and cautious language by some central bankers.

The Fed cut interest rates in September to ease fears of a worldwide credit-market meltdown. The Fed cut rates again in October as insurance against an economic downturn, Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said last week.

But Plosser pointedly noted that such insurance itself creates new risks, especially when oil and commodity prices suggest "significant" inflation pressures. A rate cut stimulates the economy, which, in turn, increases demand for food, energy and raw materials.

A big fear: a wage-price spiral, similar to what happened in the 1970s. CGM's Heebner worries about that, too: "Rising food and fuel costs will generate more pressure from labor to raise wages."

But there's a moderating influence today, Heebner says. "It's a global economy, and we have to compete with labor forces in other countries." Management can threaten to move operations overseas, where labor is cheaper.

But rate cuts also threaten to further depress the value of the dollar against other currencies. The declining dollar has played a big role in commodity markets. For example, OPEC is mulling whether to stop pricing oil in dollars, considering using a basket of currencies instead. The falling value of the dollar has cut into OPEC earnings and made oil exporters reluctant to increase production to relax price pressures. A falling dollar also means that other nations, whose currencies are worth more, are better able to afford dollar-denominated commodities, helping support prices. A lower dollar also means U.S. producers pay even more for imported commodities, stoking inflation.

"I'm shocked that the Fed, which said all year long, 'We're going to keep an eye on inflation,' they've forgotten all about it," says Adam Hewison, president of INO.com, a purveyor of data and other information to futures markets, warning that additional Fed rate cuts would "put more pressure on the dollar, meaning more inflation, importing inflation."

The Fed also fears a resurgence of an inflation mentality, when people expect and accept price increases. "If inflationary expectations rise, it could prove very costly to put the genie back in the bottle," Plosser said. "Should that scenario come to pass, the insurance policy may turn out to be a very expensive one."

Economists debate the link between higher commodity prices and inflationary spirals.

The U.S. central bank hasn't published much research on the link between commodity prices and inflation since the 1990s, when analysts found that companies limited the amount of raw materials costs they passed on. The Fed found problems from rising oil prices in the 1980s were exacerbated by lenient central bank policies.

The Fed last month issued an updated economic forecast predicting inflation will moderate in coming months — assuming proper interest rate policy — as growth slows and oil prices decline.

IMF economists Valerie Mercer-Blackman and Kevin Cheng estimate the surge in oil and other commodity prices will have a small inflationary impact in industrialized nations where economies are less energy-intensive than in the past and central banks have gained greater inflation-fighting credibility. The impact could be greater in developing nations.

And Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher has noted the odds of a "more pernicious" bleed-through from commodity prices are greater now than in recent years. The Fed's recent beige book look at economic conditions noted, for example, that three-fourths of manufacturers surveyed in the Boston Fed region raised prices to compensate for higher production costs.

That's not new to consumers, who are already scaling back.

"Inflation is mostly here. We are already seeing higher prices filter down to the consumer," says John Thomas, an analyst in McLean, Va. "My SUV is mostly parked, and I drive a smaller car, but I have cut back on other expenses, like entertainment, gift shopping and weekend road trips," Thomas says. "Next to go will be premium food."


USA Today is a registered trademark of USA Today


INO.com vs Hugo Chavez, OPEC and Crude Oil

See what Adam has to say about Hugo Chavez,
OPEC and the Crude Oil live on CNBC

Watch Video Crude Oil

Regan: Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez said today that the empire of the dollar is crashing. Well, he and the Iranian president proposed over the weekend that OPEC price oil against a basket of currencies rather than the dollar. So we're asking today, “Is OPEC more of a threat now then it has ever been in the past?” Well, to answer this one we want to bring in Adam Hewison, technical analyst of INO.com, CNBC's very own Sharon Epperson, and today's guest contributor, Vince Farrel.

Welcome to all of you. Adam, so what do you think? Should we be paying more attention to OPEC then we have in the past?

Hewison: Well this has got all the earmarks of Chavez. He's not our friend, and we have to accept that. He's using a barrel of oil as an economic weapon towards the US, that's the first point. The second point has got to be the sides aren't going to go along with it. They're not going to divest themselves of the US dollar. They've been with the US for a long time, they will continue to be with us. And, the third point is demand. We use 25% of the world's oil here in the US and we represent 5% of the population. That's not going away.

Regan: So it's an opportunity then, do you think Vince for Chavez and for Ahmadinejad to kind of gang up together against a common enemy and spout off a lot of rhetoric?

Farrel: Would you if you were another member of OPEC put your trust in these guys? I think the answer is no. I think Adam is dead right on all the points he just made, and secondly I think Venezuela's oil output is going to disappear. This guy Chavez is a nut, it's going to disappear off the world market because you need to reinvest mightily, especially down there in the Orinoco Belt which is heavy oil. Costs a lot to get out, and even more to refine. And their draining every penny out of PDVSA for his social program and putting nothing back in. And, sooner or later that's going to dry up and he's going to disappear with the sands of time.

Regan: He's certainly made life pretty tough for any American oil company trying to do anything down there in the Orinoco region, and trying to actually process this stuff and make it into oil that one can actually use.

Epperson: Well that's absolutely right Trish. And also the traders here are very concerned about if that could happen. There seems to be a lot of discourse between OPEC over this and whether or not in terms of pricing against another basket of currencies whether or not to even discuss it.

Of course there is going to be a special committee meeting about this. The issue is if it happens, they by chance were to decouple from the dollar, the acceleration of the decline of oil prices would be so great that they would be ever more of a problem then what their facing now with the falling dollar as it stands right now. It's really between a rock and a hard place here because of course OPEC members are losing money with the dollar falling.

Hewison: The price of oil going up is far greater than the decline of the dollar here, so I don't think that's necessarily the thing. You just have to look at, well two great concerns I have... one is the cold spell that's going to hit the North-East (US). I noticed it was snowing in New York today. We're going to have a very colder than normal first quarter of '08, and also demand. We've got to cut back on demand, which means we're probably going to have to build cars that get 50 mpg as opposed to 20 mpg.


Regan:
Interestingly Adam, Mr. Shavez said oil could actually go to $200. I remember at OPEC in Venezuela when he said it might hit $100/barrel. It was considered a rather crazy thought back then, $200 certainly seems rather crazy right now, but...

Hewison:
He's a great bluffer too, we have to understand that.

Regan: With that said I mean we are looking at it near $100 right now. What do you think the upward trend possibilities are for oil?

Hewison: Well, the great concern I have in the Middle East... Saudi has the greatest amount of oil in the world, period. That all has to come through the Straits of Hormuz. If there's a problem in the Straits of Hormuz, this is all in a volatile area. No one can predict; it's been volatile for the last 20 years, it's going to be volatile for the next 20 years. I have real concerns about the Straits of Hormuz possibly being blocked, and it can be blocked with the size of tankers they have now. So that would shoot prices up to $200 quite easily. So, Mr. Chavez may be right in that regard, but if nothing happens we should go sideways to maybe... uh. We will see $100 print on the tape with oil. There's do doubt in my mind.

Regan: When, when?

Hewison: I think in Q1 of '08.

Regan: Ok, we've got you on record.

Dollar mixed on uncertaintly over credit woes


By Kevin Plumberg, Reuters

NEW YORK, Nov 15 (Reuters) - The dollar rose against the euro but slipped against the yen on Thursday as fears about the credit crunch's impact and falling equity markets led investors to pare back on profitable but extended trades.


Uncertainty about the extend of the damages from the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis continued to pervade markets. Standard & Poor's cut it's long-term rating on Bear Stearns Cos as the company prepared to report its first-ever quarterly loss, while General Electric Co said on Wednesday its short-term bond fund had run into trouble and all its outside investors have liquidated their holdings.

Continued nervousness about the environment for lending has caused some dealers to trim their bets against the dollar and to reduce yen carry trades, in which the low-yielding Japanese currency is borrowed to fund purchases of higher-yielding ones.

"Risk aversion remains the guiding principle in foreign exchange markets today, with further financial-sector write-downs negatively impacting stock market performance," said Michael Wollfold, senior currency strategist with The Bank of New York Mellon.

"Declines in equity prices are keeping yen carry trades sidelined, with the greenback on the receiving end of a mild safe-haven bid," Woolfolk said in a note.

The dollar was down 0.5 percent on the day at 110.80 yen, within sight of 18-month lows of 109.10 yen set earlier this week.

The euro was down 0.2 percent at $1.430, more than a cent from a record high of $1.4752 hit last week, according to Reuters data.

"If we see the market take the euro below $1.45, then the euro will drift to the $1.43-to-$1.42 range," said Adam Hewison, president of INO.com in Shady Side, Maryland. "Overall, the market looks like it's overdone on dollar selling."

Against the yen, the euro was down 0.7 percent at 163.13 yen.

The high-yielding Australian dollar fell 0.5 percent against the greenback and the New Zealand dollar fell 0.7 percent to US$0.8920 and US$0.7585, respectively. Sterling fell to a three-week low against the dollar, hit by an unexpected fall in retail sales data. The pound fell 0.3 percent to $2.0465.

A currency dealer with a Dutch bank said many other traders are watching the pound continue to drop sharply from 26-year highs above $2.1100 reached last week, and getting nervous about locking in profits before the end of the year.

High-yielders like sterling and the New Zealand and Australian currencies could see further losses as a result of hedge fund withdrawals, according to some analysts.

Investors have to give 45 days' notice if they want to withdraw cash from hedge funds, meaning that those who want to close their positions by year-end have to say so now.

"Clients may take some money off the table as was the case in Q3 when Aug. 15 was marked with massive selling across all equity indices," said Ashraf Laidi, chief FX analyst at CMC Markets U.S. "In this case, we expect renewed rallies in the yen crosses and for the Aussie, kiwi and loonie to come under pressure."


Kevin Plumberg reports for Reuters from New York

*Reuters is a registered trademark and belongs to Reuters