Why charts are important

When prices form pictures on charts, you can obtain realistic objectives for later moves. One of the most reliable chart formations is the head-and-shoulders top or bottom. This easily recognizable chart pattern signals a major turn in trend.

The main advantage of the head-and-shoulders pattern is it gives you a clear-cut objective of the price move after breaking out of the formation. Measure the price distance between the head and the neckline and add it to the price where the neckline is broken. This projects the minimum objective. Although the head-and-shoulders gives no time projection, it predicts a very strong trend in the future.

In most cases, a head-and-shoulders formation will be symmetrical, with the left and right shoulders equally developed. Although the neckline doesn't have to be horizontal, the most reliable formations stray only a little.

Flags and pennants are consolidation patterns which give objectives for further moves. As the formation develops, price action in an uptrending market will look like a flag flying from a flagpole as prices tend to form a parallelogram after a quick, steep upmove. Flags "fly at half-staff." The more vertical the flagpole, the better.

A price objective is obtained by measuring the flagpole and adding it to the breakout point of the formation. The flagpole should begin at the point from which it broke away from a previous congestion area, or from important support or resistance lines. Flags in a downtrending market look like they are defying gravity and slant upward.

Continuation patterns

A pennant also starts with a nearly vertical price rise or fall. But, instead of having equal move reactions in the consolidation phase like a flag, pennant reactions gradually decrease to form short uptrend and downtrend lines from the flagpole.

The same measuring tools used in flags are used in pennants. Add the length of the flagpole to the breakout point to get the minimum objective. Remember, flags and pennants are usually continuation patterns in an overall trend which resumes after the breakout of the consolidation area.

Also, the coil formation, or symmetrical triangle, appears while prices trade in continually narrower ranges, forming uptrend and downtrend lines. This pattern doesn't tell you much about the direction of the next move. After breaking one of the trendlines, the objective is found by adding the width of the coil's base to the breakout point.

Cattle Monthly Futures

Springing from coils

The formation gets its name from the way prices contract and suddenly spring out of this pattern like a tight coil spring. One caution about this formation: It's best if prices break out of the formation while halfway to three-quarters of the way to the triangle's apex. If prices reach the apex, a strong move in either direction is less likely.

Ascending and descending triangles are similar to coils but are much better at predicting the direction prices will take. Prices should break to the flat side of the triangle.

Price objectives from ascending and descending triangles can be obtained two ways. The easiest is to add the length of the left side of the triangle to the triangle's flat side.

Another method of projecting price is to draw a line parallel to the sloping line from the beginning of the triangle. Expect prices to rise or fall out of the triangle formation until they reach this parallel line.

Gold Weekly Futures Corn Weekly Futures

More objectives

In the chapter on trends, we mentioned double and triple tops and bottoms. These formations also provide us with objectives. Once a double bottom is completed, prices should rise at least as far as the distance from the bottom of the "W" to the breakout point.

A double bottom is confirmed when prices close above the center of the "W" formation. This is referred to as the breakout. The difference from the bottom of the formation to the top gives a price objective. Targets for price declines from double tops are figured the same way.

Often, prices will retest the breakout point after completing the formation. After a double top is completed, prices may briefly rebound to test the resistance, which is the same point where the original double top was completed.

Adam Hewison

President, INO.com

Co-creator, MarketClub

"Saturday Seminars" - Trading the Pankin Strategy for 30% Annual Gains & Low Risk

Could you use a purely mechanical timing formula that has produced 30 percent gains a year since 1986 with strictly controlled risk? Nelson teaches you everything you need to trade the Pankin Sector Fund Strategy for exceptional profits and reduced risk. The Pankin Strategy trades Fidelity Select sector funds. Sector funds tend to trend more consistently than individual stocks or commodities and produce unusually reliable trading patterns. If you had traded this simple yet powerful system over the past twelve years, you would have outperformed 99 percent of all CTAs. The Pankin Strategy takes just a few minutes each week to update, uses straightforward logic and works for virtually any size account.

The Pankin Strategy has a superb hypothetical track record — 35 percent annual gains since 1986 (real-time performance has been just as strong). However, the original strategy requires withstanding drawdowns most individual traders find unacceptable. Money manager Mark Pankin, developer of the system, posted returns of 57 percent in 1995 and 45 percent in 1996 but the drawdowns sometimes represented as much as 25 percent of total equity.

To better gauge the risk, Nelson tests the Pankin Strategy over a wider range of market conditions. In this workshop, he simulates Pankin trading back to 1970 (considerably longer than the Fidelity Select sector funds have actually been traded). You will see that the original strategy would have generated reassuringly strong profits throughout the past twenty-eight years but with frequent and often punishing equity drawdowns (the maximum equity dip would have been an unacceptable 45 percent).

To help curb the risk, Nelson introduces you to a variety of defensive tactics he uses along with the original Pankin Strategy. As he adds risk-control measures, you will observe a powerful trading system unfold. To insure that the evolving system is theoretically sound, he tests the findings across multiple portfolios, time frames and signals. The resulting variant of the Pankin Strategy has gained 30 percent a year since 1986 with just 12 percent drawdown!

Central to this final comprehensive trading system is a filter Nelson uses to confirm Pankin signals. He demonstrates how this indicator is almost certain to capture every major stock market trend. With this and other defensive measures, you will trade the Pankin Strategy more confidently to achieve aggressive profits with limited risk.

Building a Mechanical Trading System from the Ground Up (1996).

Testing is a critical area often neglected by technicians and traders. Nelson clearly demonstrates the ease with which testing can be performed given today’s sophisticated workstations and high-performance computers. The testing power that these tools provide is now readily accessible to all traders and managers.

Nelson describes the process of building a mechanical trading system, providing concrete examples of high-return/low-risk strategies for a range of markets. Nelson also shares his favorite high-performance trading systems tested on TradeStationTM. The code (which is given to you) and methods Nelson uses are clearly stated and can be translated for use with many other popular software systems.

Nelson FreeburgNelson Freeburg is editor of Formula Research, a monthly financial letter that builds systematic timing models for the futures, fixed income, cash, and stock markets. Nelson took up trading while pursuing a Ph.D. at Columbia University. Totally absorbed by the financial markets, Nelson left academia. He decided to let the markets, rather than the university, provide his education. He began publishing Formula Research in 1991 in order to share his findings with a small nucleus of professional traders. Today, Formula Research serves hundreds of money managers and serious researchers in the cash and futures markets. Nelson’s subscribers include many of the leading names in global trading and finance. Nelson initially confined his research and trading to chart signals. When overall results proved poor, he began to examine point and figure, Elliott Wave, Market Profile, candlestick analysis, and an assortment of other technical theories. Nelson considers all of these methods deficient in their application because of their reliance on subjective judgement. In particular, Nelson feels that chart patterns become elusive in fast-paced, highly leveraged markets (such as cash foreign exchange) and that the clear buy and sell signals illustrated in textbooks rarely appear as clearly and reliably in practice. To address these shortcomings, Nelson began testing the theories of leading technicians as well as his own theories against an extensive historical database covering a broad variety of traded market items. Nelson uses the financial database he built, which reaches back into the last century, to test systems in which he can examine clearly defined and precise mechanical buy and sell signals, devoid of subjectivity. Using these objective standards, Nelson can rigorously evaluate complex system features. Additional rules, such as the user’s profit targets and stop orders, or mental stop points, can further strengthen this testing process. As a result of his research, Nelson has developed an impressive number of advanced trading systems.

---

Saturday Seminars are just a taste of the power of INO TV. The web's only online video and audio library for trading education. So watch four videos in our free version of INO TV click here.

INO TV

A dead Italian, an ex-NASDAQ chief, and a missing $50 billion.

A dead Italian, an ex-NASDAQ chief, and a missing $50 billion.

In 1949, Charles Ponzi died in Italy. Ponzi died in poverty, so he probably never fathomed that his name would live on forever in the investment world. Here we are, almost 60 years later and we are just beginning to uncover one of the biggest Ponzi schemes of all time.

Anyone in the investment industry knows that you cannot guarantee consistent returns of 10% to 12% year after year without undertaking a fair level of risk. These are the kinds of returns that Bernard L. Madoff was offering to investors. As a former chairman of the NASDAQ with over 50 years of Wall Street experience under this belt, Madoff had some impressive credentials. However, his investment program has turned out to be the biggest Ponzi scheme on record. It's funny that this unethical investment practice wasn't even uncovered by the SEC, but instead by the sons of Madoff himself.

It always amazes me that with all the investment industry regulation, a scheme of this proportion can go on for years without the SEC catching on. The SEC had multiple reports to check this guy out, but failed to do so in a timely manner. The question becomes, do we need any regulation if the regulators fail to regulate?

For those of you who don't know how a Ponzi scheme works, you can read all about here But basically it works like this: The first investor will be paid a nice return (at the rate or higher than what was promised). Once the first investor gets his money back, they tell a friend to invest money and those investors get their return from the next set of investors and so on and so forth. Little or no money ever goes into the market for trading or investing. It works up until a point and that is when there is no new money coming in. At that point, the Ponzi scheme collapses and either the organizer of the Ponzi scheme escapes on a long international trip, or they go to jail. For Bernie Madoff it looks like he's going on a trip alright, a trip to jail!

The Ponzi scheme can never work for an extended amount of time, because mathematically you run out of new investors and money. This was the case for Bernard Madoff. When the market made a downturn, Madoff did not have enough replacement funds to hush concerned investors who were eager to take back their initial investment. Eventually, the pressure became too much for Madoff when he blurted out to his two sons that his money management operations were "all just one big lie" and "basically, a giant Ponzi scheme."

Madoff is the founder of the market-making firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC, which he launched in 1960. His separate investment advisory business had $17.1 billion of assets under management. Many investors and several hedge funds have exposure by investing through Madoff's investment advisory business.

Walter Noel's, Fairfield Greenwich Group (worth $7.3 billion) and Kingate Management's, Kingate Global Fund (worth $2.8 billion) were the two most prominate hedge funds that invested with Madoff.

There has been rumors circulating throughout the years of how Madoff was making this money. I don't believe that anyone every flat-out-said that he was running a Ponzi scheme, but there were always whispers of doubt as to the legitimacy of his practice. Some argued that he was front running customer orders so he was virtually guaranteed no losses. This has yet to be proven.

Unfortunately, his family's name will be forever tied to this Ponzi scheme. What is really unfortunate is that thousands of people lost fortunes trusting Madoff.

So what is the take away from all of this is? In a nutshell, if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!

As I am writing this around noon (EST), the price of gold is higher for the week and indices are all lower for the week. This tells you yet again, that gold seems to be a better bet than stocks right now.

Enjoy the weekend,

Adam Hewison
President, INO.com
Co-creator, MarketClub

Do Not Try To Make All Your Market Money At The End of December

In a few days we will be officially entering into the silly season. Most people think of this time of year as the holiday season, but for many investors it tends to be the silly season.

If you haven't made your money in the market already this year do not try to make in the last two weeks of December. This is when the markets are at their most volatile (hard to believe after what we have been through lately) and are trading at their thinnest volumes for the year.

We had a signal on Monday to cover our short DOW position. This turned out to be a nice trade as we had been short the DOW for quite some time. This exit the DOW position came exactly at the right time of the year as we choose to sit out the rest of the year.

Don't misunderstand, covering a short position on the DOW does not change our view of the overall trend for the market. What it is saying is that the market has reached a neutrality between buyers and sellers and has stopped going down.

We would not be surprised to see the market's downtrend resume in 2009, as it appears that there are still a great many challenges ahead for the country and the economy.

If you have the time, please watch this short video I produced to show you the exact signals which told our members when to enter and exit the DOW.

It will give you a better understanding of how the markets work and how you can use our "Trade Triangle" technology in the New Year to make profits.

Enjoy the video,

Adam Hewison
President, INO.com
Co-creator, MarketClub

The Ship - RMS Treasuries

Today's guest blogger is Tony D'Altorio, an analyst for Oxbury Research. Tony's credentials include over 20 years as a stock broker and trading supervisor. Today, Tony tells a tale about the shifting market seas and how we look to captians to guide us through turbulent financial waters.

===================================================================

I am not sure where this old saying originated - “a calm sea does not a skilled sailor make.” This old saying is absolutely relevant in the investment world of today. The average individual investor turns to Wall Street investment “professionals” to guide them through these difficult economic times.

Yet most of these so-called professionals are clueless. Why? Because all they have ever experienced in their careers are bull markets in stocks and bonds – in other words, calm seas. They entered the investment business in the 80s or 90s and have seen only good times with very brief interruptions such as the 1987 swoon.

I still recall as if it were yesterday arguing with my colleagues at Schwab in the late 1990s. I kept saying that tech stocks were in a bubble and that, sooner or later, a bear market would ensue. I was always laughed at and ridiculed for my opinions. “C'mon, you'll never see a bear market again. Bear markets don't happen any more in modern-day America! After all, America is the leader in technology, the greatest military power, etc.”

I understood their perspective – they were 20 or 30 somethings who had joined the firm in the 90s and had only experienced markets which went up. They would advise clients with gems such as to buy and hold S&P 500 index funds for the long haul. I never did give such “sage” advice, which did not sit very well with my bosses. It was one of the main reasons I left the firm – I just could not tell clients in good faith such drivel.

A good example of a well-known clueless investment professional is Bill Miller of Legg Mason, of whom I've written about before. He became a Wall Street “genius” in the 1990s as his fund went up in sync with the tech bubble. His fund has been a disaster in the last few years as he bet heavily on financial stocks.

This past week Mr. Miller stated that the “bottom has been made” in US equities. That statement immediately told me we have further to go on the downside! Mr. Miller also called for - of course - the Federal Reserve to purchase stocks and junk bonds directly. Mr. Miller has that typical Wall Street combination of ignorance and a sense of entitlement.

Bond Market Bozos

However, even Mr. Miller's stupidity pales in comparison to the bozos in the Treasury market who are fighting each other in Wall Street's version of Thunderdome to “invest” their clients' money at rates of zero or one or two per cent. These people remind me of children gathered around a warm campfire on a cold evening roasting marshmallows who frighten each other with ghost stories.

Although instead of ghosts, it's deflation. Boo – deflation! “I think I see deflation”! There are panicked screams! “Oooh – I'm so scared”! “ I'd better go out and put every penny I “manage” for other people into T-bills at zero per cent”!

These frightened fools have priced in corporate default rates of 21% (the rate during the Great Depression was 15%) and deflation in the US for the next 5 to 10 years. As I've stated in previous articles, deflation is merely a bond market 'ghost story' meant to frighten people and separate them from their money.

At most, deflation would last in the US for no more than a few months. My view would change only if I saw actual 1930s type of economic statistics such as 25% unemployment or the US nominal GDP dropping by 50%.

Why do I think deflation is not a long-term threat? It's simple economics – a huge debtor nation such as the US cannot sustain deflation. In order to survive, the US needs inflation so that the country can pay back its debt with much “cheaper” dollars.

That process has already begun. Why do you think that the Federal Reserve is expanding our monetary base by more than $11 billion a day since September? And that does not include the latest trillion dollars that is being injected by the Fed into the financial system.

RMS Treasuries

The clueless sailors, or should I say pirates, of Wall Street have decided to put all of their remaining booty onto the ship called RMS Treasuries. Like it famous predecessor, the RMS Titanic, the RMS Treasuries is considered to be ultra-safe and “unsinkable.” I believe that much like its predecessor, the RMS Titanic, the RMS Treasuries will hit an iceberg and sink ignominiously into history.

The iceberg that the RMS Treasuries will hit will be inflation. Inflation will result from the massive printing of Monopoly money by the Federal Reserve in order to fund the US Treasury's seemingly insatiable need for tens of trillions of dollars to bail out Wall Street.

A side bar - sadly, America seems to be going down the road to where Wall Street is taken care of, it seems, but nobody else. A half-century ago, President Eisenhower warned Americans about an overly powerful “military-industrial complex”. I wonder what Ike would think about the “financial-political complex” that seems to be running the country now? And running it poorly, I might add!

Massive printing of money has, throughout history, always led to inflation. Despite what Wall Street says, this time will be no different. Always remember that the most dangerous words in the investment world are that “this time it's different”.

The clueless Wall Street sailors have basically turned the US Treasury market into a market with “return-free risk”. Investors should not ignore the flashing warning light – credit default swaps which insure against a default by the US rose to an all-time high this past week.

WANTED – A Few Good Sailors

It saddens me to see that the money entrusted to Wall Street “professionals” by average Americans is being lost. Somewhere along the route to prosperity for everyone, the Wall Street pirates hijacked the ship containing investors' capital. These Wall Street pirates had a huge drunken party with other peoples' money.

Much of that money has already been lost. What I fear is that the remaining money will go down with the RMS Treasuries and also disappear forever. It will be a devastating blow to our country to see an entire generation of Americans' hard-earned savings go down the toilet, just to finance the party that Wall Street had.

What can an individual investor do? The best advice I can give is to keep an open mind, look for opportunities, switch off CNBC, and get opinions and advice from sources which are completely independent from Wall Street.

I still have many friends in the investment industry working for brokerage firms, financial planners, and financial advisory firms and the advice they give has changed little. It's still the same drivel they were spewing in the 1990s. They are expecting “calm seas” to return any day now.

I would rate their skills as “sailors” right up there with Bob Denver's famous character – Gilligan. My kingdom for good sailors to help average investors navigate the current treacherous economic seas!

Smooth Sailing,

Tony D’Altorio

Analyst, Oxbury Research

===================================================================

Originally formed as an underground investment club, Oxbury Publishing is an investment think tank second to none. The research team is comprised of a wide variety of investment professionals from equity analysts to futures floor traders all independent thinkers and all capital market veterans.