Leonard Melman: Are You Prepared for Hyperinflation?

The Gold Report: You recently told a crowd of investors at Prospectors Developer Association of Canada (PDAC) that precious metals are the best place to invest in an inflationary period. Why is that?

Leonard Melman: When prices are going up, you wouldn't want to be in housing stocks or auto financing, but you would certainly want to be in precious metals. You also might want to short the bond market. That is why you have to be aware of the direction of inflation. It is important to the concept of precious metals pricing. If you've been around for a few years, as I've been lucky enough to be, then you can easily recall a time when high inflation was the absolute key ingredient in massive previous bull markets. That is why I thoroughly look at what has led to past inflation and hyperinflation. I use four examples: the Roman Empire, the French Revolution in the late 1700s, the German hyperinflation in the 1920s and the recent catastrophe of hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. I examine whether America and other countries in the world are perhaps following the same paths that led to those previous hyperinflations.

TGR: Do you think investors are going to see hyperinflation in the foreseeable future?

LM: Not immediately. It's like a doctor looking at a patient who is showing all the early signs of cancer, but the actual tumor hasn't yet developed. It would be unwise to ignore those developing symptoms. That's where I think we are. We don't have hyperinflation yet, but many of the pathways that led to previous hyperinflations are present, and I think it would be very foolish to ignore them.

TGR: In a recent edition of The Melman Report, you quoted Patrick Armstrong, head of investment selection at Armstrong Investment Managers, as saying, "We think a currency war will be the biggest story of 2013." How is that likely to affect precious metals equities?

LM: There has been a lot of coverage about currency wars recently. So far the main participants have been countries like Japan and the European community, which are very concerned that strength in their currencies is going to limit their ability to export goods at a profitable rate. Japan has recently done everything it can to lower the value of its currency and the euro is now entering a new period of weakness. So far, the one currency that hasn't played this game is the U.S. dollar. The other currencies look weak compared to the U.S. dollar. When the U.S. dollar looks strong, usually gold and silver perform poorly, which we are seeing now. As the year progresses, the dollars' immunity will soften, which should spill over into higher precious metals prices.

TGR: Gold has fallen below the $1,600 per ounce ($1,600/oz) support level. What is your macro picture for gold?

LM: I'm not one to ignore charting. I'm a member of the Canadian Society of Technical Analysts. I can't ignore the weakness that gold is showing. However, I believe powerful forces, such as inflation and currency devaluation, are going to appear stronger in the future. That should lead to higher gold prices over the second half of the year.

"As the year progresses, the dollars' immunity will soften, which should spill over into higher precious metals prices."

Another factor is that countries are now repatriating their gold holdings. Germany just announced it is going to be bringing back much of the gold now held in foreign storage, particularly in France and in America. Venezuela just repatriated all its foreign gold holdings and Switzerland is now moving forward with a referendum on whether it should reform or repatriate all its gold holdings held in foreign lands. A lot of underlying pressures will be positive for gold and silver ultimately.

TGR: Do you believe that the timeframe for Germany's repatriation of its gold has a lot to do with the fact that its gold may not actually be where it's supposed to be?

LM: Of course, that's one of the most important questions this is addressing. I find it very interesting that there has not been an audit of the United States government-controlled physical gold holdings in facilities such as Fort Knox or Federal Reserve vaults in more than 33 years. Can you imagine a private company getting away without allowing an audit of its books for that length of time? That is what the government has done.

If the gold isn't really there, a sudden buying surge could occur as guarantors scramble to fulfill the demands.

TGR: Do you see gold continuing to trend lower through 2013?

LM: I'm looking for the long-term bullish forces to exert themselves during the second half of the year, particularly in the last quarter. There is a great deal of gloom and doom for metals at the moment. The gold share indexes, like the Philadelphia Gold and Silver Index (XAU), the Amex Gold BUGS Index (HUI) and the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX), are all in virtual freefall. But wasn't it Baron Nathan Rothschild who once said, "Buy when there's blood in the streets?" Usually isn't that what happens? A selling climax terrifies everyone and then, all of a sudden, with surprising swiftness, prices begin to recover and head higher.

We may be in the process of that now because the selling is absolutely pervasive. Such a selling climax could easily be followed by stronger markets in the second half of the year.

TGR: Silver is falling too, though slower than gold. What's your outlook for silver?

LM: I would dispute that statement. Silver peaked in the summer of 2012 at $37.50/oz and it's trading at $28.50/oz this morning. That's a $9/oz difference, a 20+% decline. In the same time, gold has fallen from $1,800/oz to about $1,580/oz. That's $220/oz, which is only about 12%, so silver is making a much greater percentage move to the downside.

"I'm looking for the long-term bullish forces to exert themselves during the second half of the year, particularly in the last quarter."

I recently completed a chart analysis comparing the five-year charts of gold and silver and the timing of the moves is virtually precise. When gold makes a bottom, silver makes a bottom. When gold makes a relative high, silver makes a relative high. But in virtually every case, silver's move is exaggerated on a percentage basis. The reason is that it takes less money to move silver than it does to move gold and therefore you get bigger percentage moves.

The same thing will hold true in the next bull market wavegold will rally. Silver will rally in a greater percentage. Also remember, silver is an industrial metal and the beneficiary of many new scientific advances, which are increasing the demand for silver.

TGR: Where are you seeing value in the junior mining equity space right now? What types of companies will be able to ride this out?

LM: Several companies have entered production over the last year and once they have cash flow coming in, they can use it to develop their projects or build up their cash balances, thereby eliminating the need to look for financing. Those companies are in the best shape. Also, during the last couple of years several companies have adopted the royalty model, helping other companies get their projects into production and in return receiving royalties. Outside revenue options have been key for company survival.

One of the symptoms of the problems facing many juniors is a lack of cash and this shows up in the number of equity offerings in relatively small amounts, $200,000400,000, rather than several million dollars. When I see those, I suspect that the biggest problem is just keeping the doors open. Those companies are in a difficult position and unless we get a rally quickly they may be in trouble.

TGR: When you last talked with The Gold Report, you discussed Orko Silver Corp. (OK:TSX.V), which has since had several takeover bids with Coeur d'Alene Mines Corp. (CDM:TSX; CDE:NYSE) looking like the successful acquirer. What are the takeaways from those competing bids?

LM: Orko is a company I've been familiar with for some years and I have a very sound working relationship with Ben Whiting, the chief geologist. Orko's strength came from the depth of its exploration and development, which took place over about a 710 year period, where it proved very sizable reserves, making it attractive to companies like First Majestic Silver Corp. (FR:TSX; AG:NYSE; FMV:FSE) and Coeur d'Alene.

Despite the difficult share price environment, companies believe Orko could develop into a very profitable mining venture and that is why it was so attractive.

It's been a very profitable venture for Orko's shareholders as the price bottomed earlier in the year at just above $1/share and now they are getting $2.70 equivalent value for their shares. That's not a bad deal at all.

TGR: What are some silver plays that you are following?

LM: SilverCrest Mines Inc. (SVL:TSX.V; SVLC:NYSE.MKT) and Great Panther Silver Ltd. (GPR:TSX; GPL:NYSE.MKT) are two companies that I have followed for some time. SilverCrest has a productive mine in Sonora, Mexico, the Santa Elena, but it also has a very good prospective property, the La Joya in Durango. The company is using revenue developed from Santa Elena to finance exploration and development at La Joya. It is building value and the share price has reflected it.

TGR: SilverCrest recently doubled the contained silver equivalent ounces at its La Joya project from about 102 million ounces (102 Moz) silver equivalent to 198.6 Moz. Is that enough to create interest among the small-cap producer set?

LM: It's enough to develop substantial interest if SilverCrest is aiming toward having the project bought out. But it's also worth noting that SilverCrest is working to steadily increase production at Santa Elena. As long as it can obtain increasing rates of positive cash flow, it might be very interested in keeping the La Joya project and advancing it toward production. I don't know if that decision has been made yet, but it could be attractive as a potential buyout for the La Joya, or as a possible candidate for production.

TGR: And Great Panther?

LM: Great Panther accomplished the same thing a few years ago. Its goal now is to continue to increase production and increase value through advancing other areas of exploration. The stock has moved sideways lately. Its mining operations have not been without some problems, but it appears to have the reserves. It has production capacity. It's a worthwhile company for people to take a look at.

TGR: Great Panther is currently trading at around $1.12/share and, as you said, it's been trading sideways since the fall. SilverCrest has suffered some bumps along the way, but is generally on the rise. Has Great Panther's share price weakness made it a target?

LM: It could. If Great Panther is interested in entertaining offers, I believe there are offers out there. It has both the reserves and production capacity and that combination could make it very attractive to any company, but especially to a major. The majors are looking to replace the reserves they are going through. Companies like Great Panther could be on the shopping list.

TGR: Are there any other silver companies you would like to talk about?

LM: Well, one of the companies worth a look is El Tigre Silver Corp. (ELS:TSX.V; EGRTF:OTCQX; 5RT:FSE). El Tigre is a combination of many things. First, it has the potential for early cash flow because one of the values of its property is an immense tailings pile. It was left behind from mining operations that went on from 1905 to 1935. The operations handled ore, which was rated at as much as 40 ounces per ton (40 oz/ton), so when the miners of that era came across tailings that were only 34% silver, they deemed them completely not worth looking at. As much as 800,000 tons piled up through the years and El Tigre is planning to bring those into production.

"It takes less money to move silver than it does to move gold and therefore you get bigger percentage moves. "

The last time I talked to Stuart Ross, El Tigre's president and CEO, the company was already assembling equipment and expertise to bring those into production at the earliest possible time. It's looking at actual revenue production before the end of 2013. In the meantime the company has two goals for exploration on the property. One is exploring for gold, which it believes could be quite substantial, but it is also searching areas close to where the 40 oz/ton silver had been located during the first mining event in the hope of hitting some of those bonanza grades. There is both the productive end to it and a good potential exploration end. On a risk/reward basis El Tigre is a stock that people should take a look at.

TGR: Will the production be enough to continue to finance El Tigre's exploration?

LM: I believe it will. We're talking about 800,000 tons of tailings. If the company is recovering 2.5 oz/ton from 800,000 tons, we're talking about 2 Moz silver. Even at today's market value, that's gross revenue of between $55 million ($55M) and $60M. With lower costs, even if El Tigre had to crush the ore, you can see that there is potential for very substantial net cash flow.

By the way, there's also another important point about the tailings. There is as yet an undetermined amount of tailings, which were used as underground fill during the early mining operations. Some of those tailings could be of a much higher grade than just 3%. The company also has discovered some areas of 7% and 8%. So, the potential for revenue could be more than is just evident by the 800,000 tons in the big pile.

TGR: Do you have any other updates on companies?

LM: When we talked last time I spoke about Commerce Resources Corp. (CCE:TSX.V; D7H:FSE; CMRZF:OTCQX) and Zimtu Capital Corp. (ZC:TSX.V), which both share the same president.

I just met with Chris Grove, a director at Commerce. Chris was telling me that Commerce has completed preliminary economic assessments (PEAs) on both its tantalum project at Blue River, British Columbia, which is tantalum and niobium, and its rare earth element project in Northern Qubec, the Ashram project, also known as the Eldor project. The next goal is to advance metallurgical studies on those projects. That work is underway at the moment so within whatever cash constraints are evident in the industry the company is still moving forward. The fact that Commerce has achieved two PEAs on widely separate projects is a very positive feature. It could conceivably make the company very attractive to end-user companies, which currently rely on China for rare earth elements. China appears to be very shaky looking forward as a source for those materials. Companies will be looking for North American sources and I think Commerce could be sitting in the right position.

TGR: Commerce recently announced that in testing it had doubled its concentrate grade from about 20% to 40% total rare earth oxides. It did so by using a new technology called wet high intensity magnetic separation. Commerce is claiming this is the highest grade concentration of any developing rare earth project. If so, it could make Commerce the preferred supplier of concentrate the world over because 40% concentrate is quite a high grade.

LM: In the rare earth field that would be exceedingly high.

TGR: What can you tell our readers about David Hodge, president of Commerce and Zimtu Capital?

LM: I have known Dave for quite a few years. Aside from his booming voice, he's been instrumental in helping numerous mining companies find the funding to advance projects. Commerce was one of those companies that has come a long way under his leadership. He's very active in the mining industry and very aware of developments. Through Zimtu he has been a substantial positive influence, which has moved several projects a long way forward.

TGR: It doesn't hurt these days to have a financing arm connected to your company.

LM: Zimtu's business is advancing junior projects. What it does is accumulate an inventory of junior projects and then market them out to groups that look as if they're in a position to advance the projects. Zimtu has the capital available to acquire potential projects at rock bottom prices and build up the inventory of projects that can be farmed out to new sources of capital. The growing availability of new projects coming to market at discounted prices due to their owners' financial difficulties could enhance the workability of its game plan very substantially going forward.

TGR: What's happening in Cambodia?

LM: Angkor Gold Corp. (ANK:TSX.V) is a very interesting story. Perhaps the most interesting feature is that Angkor Gold is the earliest development company to enter into Cambodian mining development. It has a huge, 2,000 square kilometer holding. It started originally as a simple mining exploration and development venture, but has recently gone into project generation, including the building of future royalties. Those project developments have recently brought in more than $2M to the treasury and created a royalty base of 10% of any silver or gold produced from the new projects. It's changing direction to bring in current revenue, so it doesn't have to go to the financial markets to sustain its own exploration work. Angkor Gold is also insisting upon a royalty stream down the road if those projects enter production.

TGR: Angkor Gold was also seeking copper-gold porphyry targets. Have they made any progress toward finding a large copper-gold porphyry system?

LM: That is what I'm looking for right now. The company's total property holdings are in eight different areas and some of them show the potential for copper, gold and molybdenum. The potential is there. The company is just in the early stages of a lot of its exploration, but the potential is very definitely there in several directions.

TGR: Thank you, Leonard, for your insights.

Leonard Melman, publisher of The Melman Report, has been writing about precious and base metals for more than two decades as monthly columnist for California-based ICMJ's Prospecting and Mining Journal and Vancouver's Resource World Magazine. He focuses on how political and financial considerations impact the world of mining and the prices of the metals.

Want to read more Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Streetwise Interviews page.


Disclosure:

1) Brian Sylvester conducted this interview for The Gold Report and provides services to The Gold Report as an employee or as an independent contractor. He or his family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None.

2) The following companies mentioned in the interview are sponsors of The Gold Report: Angkor Gold Corp., Great Panther Silver Ltd., SilverCrest Mines Inc., Zimtu Capital Corp. and Commerce Resources Corp. Streetwise Reports does not accept stock in exchange for its services or as sponsorship payment.

3) Leonard Melman: I or my family own shares of the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. I personally or my family am paid by the following companies mentioned in this interview: None. My company has a financial relationship with the following companies mentioned in this interview: SilverCrest Mines Inc., Zimtu Capital Corp., Commerce Resources Corp. and Angkor Gold Corp. I was not paid by Streetwise Reports for participating in this interview. Comments and opinions expressed are my own comments and opinions. I had the opportunity to review the interview for accuracy as of the date of the interview and am responsible for the content of the interview.

4) Interviews are edited for clarity. Streetwise Reports does not make editorial comments or change experts' statements without their consent.

5) The interview does not constitute investment advice. Each reader is encouraged to consult with his or her individual financial professional and any action a reader takes as a result of information presented here is his or her own responsibility. By opening this page, each reader accepts and agrees to Streetwise Reports' terms of use and full legal disclaimer.

6) From time to time, Streetwise Reports LLC and its directors, officers, employees or members of their families, as well as persons interviewed for articles and interviews on the site, may have a long or short position in securities mentioned and may make purchases and/or sales of those securities in the open market or otherwise.

Article source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/theaureport/Ajgh/~3/KexGzzb8mik/15063

8 thoughts on “Leonard Melman: Are You Prepared for Hyperinflation?

  1. Fact: The CPI figures are utterly bogus and fraudulent. One only has to look at the calculation of less than 2% of the weighting dedicated towards health care premiums to know that, and to compare your yearly expenditures for just about everything year over year. Clothing, auto expenses, soaring education costs, dentist, medical, groceries, lumber, equipment, anything you can think of. If you live under a rock you haven't seen inflation, the rest of us live in the real world.

    The CPI calculations were drastically altered in 1999, using pre 1999 metrics you would have a more accurate figure. Absolutely astounding there are still sheep who believe what they are told instead of what they actually see and experience.

  2. You have to be brain challenged, with fewer than two brain cells, to LOGICALLY conclude that NOW is a great time to sell gold (and the other precious metals) and load up on worthless paper: cash, bonds, treasuries and stocks, considering: "the cliff", "the sequestration", Fed money printing/pumping (2013-Jan.: M1 $2469.5 billion; M2 $10444.6 billion), budget deficit, foreign balance of payments, $16.694+T U. S. base debt today, $54-$57 trillion in stock market derivatives and, in real terms (GDP - inflation rate), a contracting GDP economy (including the latest quarterly report) PLUS the European debt crisis and a decreasine GDP!!!

    1. There are some good reasons to buy precious metals. The industry was in a long term downtrend from 1980 - 2000 and growth in the industry has often come from becoming more efficient and mining stocks that were un-mineable 50 years ago. The developing countries have started to learn that pure capitalism has its own problems and hybrid economies like China, Brazil, and South Korea have been flourishing and creating a new middle class that needs raw resources.

      Hyperinflation is not such a reason, however, and promoting lies about hyperinflation to sell a metals investment story is frankly irresponsible.

      Carlos - We agree that we are in asset bubbles, but we disagree on the cause. We saw similar asset bubbles all the time between 1880 and 1929 and they went away under the new deal to be replaced by a growth rate in the real economy that we had never seen before. Consider that we saw more economic growth after inflation under 12 years of FDR than we did under all the Republican presidents of the last century combined (48 years). The economics behind this can be described very simply. When rich people have too much money, then you can see the effects because dollars that are chasing return on investment go up while dollars that are spent to provide that return go down. The net result is you have to invest more and more dollars to get less and less return pushing interest rates to 0, which is where they have been headed since Reagan took office.

      We agree that the Fed has been printing too much money, but the amount of money they have been printing is based on the amount of money needed to keep price inflation above zero. Note that price inflation and interest rates are very closely related in the sense that when goods are scarce compared with consumer dollars price inflation occurs, whereas when consumer dollars are scarce compared with asset dollars, asset inflation occurs, which is basically the same thing as interest rates go down. The division of new dollars between price inflation, economic growth, and asset inflation is one of the key things to understand in our system and if you have a bad mix of those three, then you have to print a lot of dollars to keep economic growth above zero.

      An any case, a decade of 10% growth per year like we had in 1933-1942 would go a long way toward solving the problems of the country.

      1. Thank you for your very comprehensive answer. I am not an economist. I am an engineer, albeit I studied one year of Economics in my engineering curriculum ca. 1948. I learned that inflation is the expansion of the money supply; deflation is the opposite and every thing else adjusts to them. I would like to explain certain points. I have been accumulating precious metals bullion, mostly gold, not because I fear hyperinflation, but as insurance to protect the VALUE of the money I had managed to save during my working years, because I know that, most of the time, there is inflation. It is built into the eeconomic system. I compare the prices of: a house, a car, a pound of bread, butter, salt, sugar; a gallon of milk and of gasoline between 1927 (the year I was born) and 2013 and I see the result of inflation. My 85-year gold chart has two points: Year 1927 - Price $20; Year 2013 - Price $1580 (at this time).

        1. I should clarify my comments on inflation.

          I have been told that the official economic definition of inflation is expansion of the money supply. Many people also use inflation to mean price increases on consumables and their required materials. I try to use the term price inflation when I am talking about this.

          There is a strong push in certain segments of the financial community to try to talk about monetary expansion and price inflation as if they were just two sides of the same coin. Nothing could be further from the truth. There are three likely outcomes of monetary expansion:
          * Consumer Price increases - This will tend to happen when people who don't have enough money to buy everything they want get more money and there is no extra production available to come online for the weakest links of production.
          * Economic growth ensues - This will tend to happen when people who don't have enough money to buy everything they want get more money and there is extra production available to come online.
          * Asset prices increase - You can see this happening when instead of milk going from $3 to $30 over thirty years, Gold goes from $300 an ounce to $1500 an ounce, Housing price to rent ratios go up, interest rates go toward zero, and Stock P/E's go up. One way of looking at this is you have fewer dollars chasing tacos and more dollars chasing taco bells and the price for production capabilities goes up without actually getting any new production.

          This of course ignores production efficiencies, but I would argue that it should, be cause production efficiency increases can occur under any one of the three paradigms above and there are certain types more likely to occur when capital is more available and other types more likely to occur when labor is expensive.

  3. No meaning to talk about any consept like "Hyperinflation"if present debt based financial system will continued, only question will be remain of tenderability of currencies world wide.

  4. Hyperinflation won't occur, imo. We will see higher rates in inflation as we have now, very probably, but no hyperinflation. FED has various other mechanisms to combat inflation, though inflation is somhow wanted.

  5. Are you prepared for hyper-*deflation*?

    Hyperinflation is a phenomenon that occurs when the normal supply/demand rules for currency break down on the international market. Normal supply and demand rules state that when the price of a foreign currency goes up, demand for that foreign currency should go down which will bring buyers and sellers into balance in terms of desired trade quantity. There are certain situations where you absolutely have to have that foreign currency, which would happen for a private investor during a short squeeze and would happen for a country when debt repayment plus absolute minimum sustenance import budget is greater than export revenues and there isn't a foreign currency reserve to fall back on. In this case, price increase of the foreign currency actually causes an increase in local currency dollars offered for tender instead of a decrease as normal supply and demand would state. This causes supply and demand forces to push in the same direction and the price moves very, very fast with nothing blocking it.

    Hyperdeflation is similar, but it has to do with labor supply and demand instead of foreign currency supply and demand levels. Humans have a v-shaped supply and demand curve for labor. On the left side of the curve people have to work to meet fixed debts and bare minimum expenses. Decreases in wages will prompt an increase in the supply of labor. On the right side of the labor supply curve, you see the Greed side. Increases in wages will prompt an increase in labor supply. If some people are on the left side of the V, the problem slowly get's rectified, through foreclosure, bancruptcy, or simply finding an opportunity to move income to the right. If too many people at once are on the left side of the V, then you find a circumstance that is not supposed to happen in economics, which is, on a national scale, decreases in wages prompt increase in labor supply, rather than the expected decrease in supply. This sets labor supply and labor demand to pushing wages in the same direction - down, and again with forces pushing in the same direction, you get movement that is very, very fast. We saw how quickly this can devastate a country during the Great Depression.

    The key question here is, do we have more to worry about from hyperinflation or hyperdeflation? I will suggest that hyperdeflation is the greater worry here, but fortunately the fix for both is the same. Increase the bargaining position of the bottom 90% of society and set up a playing field tilted a bit in their favor. That will solve the trade deficit problem that started in 1980 under Reaganomics, the Income distribution problem that started in 1980 under Reaganomics, the high incarceration rate, which started in 1980 under Reaganomics and under 3 strike laws, the dangerous asset bubbles that started in 1980 under Reaganomics, the growth slowdown that started in 1980 under Reaganomics, and the National debt problem that started in 1980 under Reaganomics.

Comments are closed.